Then what is, tell me what your contradction to this would be, one example is all I ask for
how about when your forebrain is at least
half way developed? 18 is a fine compromise.
No, there are scientific ways of picking the right random sample for the best representation of a very large amount of people.
I suggest you study Statistics before you go ahead an make false statements
I know all about statistics.
I also know that these tests are (for economic efficiency and convinience) taken in a few areas with a good amount of people (50+ usually) this noding system is a poor statistical method.
you have corruption of statistics. its that simple.
No, there are scientific ways of picking the right random sample for the best representation of a very large amount of people.
no. not at all
say for example, you decide to take in as many factors as possible, 10,000 students tested, 50 per area thats 200 test areas.
say we try to divide into as many fair test groups as possible, suburban, rural, urban is one divicive factor, so we divide the groups up according to percentage of students in each
now we divide up by budget of the schools, again by percentage
finally say we divide up by geographic prevalence, south central, south west, bread basket, north east, north west, south east, north central the rockies etc.
at this point you have to redo the entire system so that everybody gets represented by something, percentages cant fit this.
now: you have just a few groups in each area, maybe 2 schools are tested for every 1000 in the area, now you factor in other variables that 200 groups are invdivisible over.
now, as you can see, its quite obvious taht the smaller, more monographic European states have a distinct advantage, these divisions are putting abnormal percentages of tests into the more distinct lower regions, rather than the pervasive better system.
