yah tesb faster spawn rate might hurt yourself more than the enemy, but then it can also be used to overwhelm your enemy and win. Spending money on something which only gives you an advantage on certain situations is an interesting concept I think especially as you have also the option to upgrade the strength of your troops if you don't want to take that risk.

Alot of people are complaining about faster spawn rate but i think if u get a couple upgrades for creeps like increased health or something, having a larger spawn would be pretty nice. Also what if your a general, then a larger spawn would be pretty nice on top of their special units.

I probobly would too and lean torwards stronger units but for some generals alot of units might be  good.

WAIT!!!

I am more that happy to see citidel upgrades and more info but that brings me to the questions:

What if there are more that one players on a team, who decides on what upgrades to take?
Is the gold invested in the upgrade come from the team pool or from the one who chose the upgrades?

We should think about those problems

I can think on one solution, in which before the match the team deciced on a captain who choose the upgrades.

What do you think?

This is TEAMplay. So i guess the $$ for the citadel upgrade comes from the players. A wise team will discuss a strategy for buying citadel upgrade.

They will be verry hard to do because you have to think about your new armor or better creep on maps.

On my case, it will depends on the situation.

I think the upgrades should be bought for the whole team, but on a upgrade by upgrade basis.  In other word I spend my own money and then I get to choose what upgrade get purchased.  That is the most straight forward and logical approach.  Although, I would love to see a setup where you can put 50% or some smaller increment toward a purchase and your team could do so as well, or if you like you could come back later to pay what your team did not.

I am sure that that is something technically feasible.  When we get the beta, we should request it.  That is ne of those tweaks that is more than reasonable.

I think that u should be able to get them for yourself but if the majority of the team votes yes on getting an upgrade then a small amount will be taken or whatever amount to pay for it. If your team buy it it will cost less than everyone indivually buying it though.

This is really really nice. I'd love to see it in action.

I think each player should have there own portal and upgrades in a multiplayer game. Because I can tell you right now that if one person gets to use the updates in the Citadel that will be very lame and bad for this game.

The minimap looks nice.

It's nice and light weight.  Thanks for not screwing up a large portion of my screen.  I was so worried we'd get some big opaque box or circle.

I do not believe he thinks he is any sort of alpha god, I share his sentiment. I understnad your idea Iprometheus, I think there could definitely be problems and disagreements with who upgrades the citadel and how it is done, although I do think that everyone getting their own portal is a bit much. What if the game is a 2v3 match? 3 potals against 2 will make a big difference, and ultimately its possible to have a 1v5 match, I can't even fathom that.

The point is, its not your ideas that people are disagreeing with, but the way you present them. You do come off as rude a good deal of the time, whether you mean to or whether that is actually who you are, it might be good to try and express what you are trying to say differently at times