First off I want to say that I own most of Stardocks games, and I love them as a company. They respond with actual specific facts when they post problems, and have very good customer support. I also enjoy their games, and their outlook on the gaming industry. In particular, I think their Gamer's Bill of Rights, is a very good thing.
One of the main points it makes is that some of the draconian DRM that games are employing can severely punish people for legally buying the games. Things like limited number of installations, cd-keys that you cannot lose, and other various account securities. I can speak from experience, when I tried to install a legal copy of Maya on a laboratory computer, and it took many hours for it to work (legally), when I knew that a pirated, cracked version would install and work in a matter of minutes.
So I was on board, thinking that low DRM is great for us legal users. A pirated sale isn't necessarily a lost sale, so who cares if they pirate. Then the past few days happened and I realized something. For the multiplayer experience, low DRM **can** hurt the legal customers. Here we were trying to play the game, and the other 100,000 bastards were denying our service with illegal copies. I wouldn't have imagined that their actions could also affect us, it's a shame. Now the pirates *are* causing lost sales; they're causing people to be turned away from a great game.
Anyway, I just wanted to vent a little bit. I'm a little disillusioned about the prospect of this sort of business plan holding up.
Though I'm also curious as to what could be done with an Impluse account that you'd have to log into and verify your install / registration *IF* you want to play a multiplayer game. (I"m curious as to how these pirates are logging in at all).