I'm currently the no. 5 Oak in the game (pretty neat! I'm very proud of this accomplishment, since I am God-awful at virtually every videogame I've ever owned in the last 18 years of being old enough to play
) and currently possess 1,117 "experience" in the rankings and have no idea how that number is generated.
People with far fewer games than me can have much, much more experience, even though I have more wins, total games played, favor points, and playtime in the game. So sure, my four losses (against 22 wins) might give me a lower percentage than the guy with 1 win and 0 losses--maybe it's a percentage-based system. Then why isn't every player who has only won a single match not up at the top of the rankings, like razattack1337 is? And why is a guy who is going 9/0 below both me AND razattack?
I don't really mind being outranked, and indeed, as more people learn to play the game (and especially as summer holidays start and I graduate, losing my high speed internet and moving back to a place with only dialup), I fully expect my ranking to drop like a brick, permanently. I am just curious how the scores are calculated 