Hol +vlemish + some basic hp items is well under 10k. Should ber possible in 10-13 level range. 

An ooze UB does not stand a change to focus fire from everything the Rook can employ. Really play DeadMg in a real game, he is a pretty good Rook player and knows what im talking about.

You dont need all the last levels of skills, you only need boulderrol lvl 1 for most of the game, usually rank 2 slam depending on the game, and the rest towers, godstrenth and shoulder. 

I DONT SAY TOWERROOK IS OP. I'm just refuting common misconceptions about Rook having low mana, low hp, slow speed, not being able to have towers and slam.

Usually I push most people out of my lane, then get one of their portals, and if that doesnt work, I get Hammerslam and boulderroll to high ranks get hp and journeymantreads and the like and play the rest of the game as Warspeed Rook at 10 speed. Ofc that more for shits n giggles;-).

True HOL is getting nerfed, but I ussually dont get it.

Also I meant 10k at lvl13-15 no lvl 10.

No I'm not, why the fuck would he win? Rook Does NOT have low armor, yes UB has more natural armor, but the difference is so small and is ussually overcome by the Rook having so many chestpieces while the UB can go full hp but will lose on dmg and speed which arent very important for Rook. 

Towers easily out dps ooze unless you got more than 50 armor mitigation and the Rook hasent prorperly positoned them. Most Dps from Rook does not come from his autoattack, so the ooze debuff isnt really that usefull. 

Uhm Hammerslam is 1.5 secs,RR I is 1.5 secs. if he attacking you you can just RR than it takes around .35 secs for lag and reaction, than you hit with hammerslam. This means that he has .35 secs to get away, now it can be done if the Rook is a bit slow, but even if he runs away... he gets pounded by Rooks towers shoulders and AA. Rook has naturally more hp, slightly less armor, but he only needs a mana helm some potion and consumables and the rest can be pretty much armor or general stat boosters(unbreakable boots).

No I'm just saying that no DG can kill a Rook in his castle without sieging the castle first. 1750 gold for vlemisch and a mana potion, thats a lot?  Maybe a super hp stacked UB will be able to have more health, but I doubt it very much, since you are in possesion of the hp flag(if you any sort of brain). Now your gonna say I wont be able to build my castle at the hp flag, but that bollocks. Speed isnt needed, only for lategame, I just slowly creep my towers to eenemy base, and teleport around. 

Hammerslam rank2 at level 10-11, at lvl 15 I have it maxed obviously. Now Rook isnt OP, he can be killed in his castle, but he can be attrioned down, run around or ganked since he is slow(but you can tele out) and his tower dont scale.

So for the number: lvl10-12, I have hammerslam II or III and RookRoll I plus max towers shoulders and godstrenthg.

The Ub has 5.8 k hp, maxed ooze and some stats. 

I have5.3 k plus hp flag. 

The UB charges in and get pounded by my towers 500 hp lost, he tries to attack and I Rookroll my AA towers and shoulders do another 400 dmg. He begins to attack, I lose 280 hp every second while he loses 8* lets say 80 dmg plus AA and shoulder which do another 200 dps. If he tries to foulgrasp me I hammerslam him, if he evades I abort and get some hits in, if he does not he loses 900-1300 dm. Its pretty clear now no?

Look, I'm tired of this. You are acting like Rook is a flat out god who can't be touched and wins everything, and every Rook player can play perfectly and somehow interrupt a near instant interrupt with a 1.5 second cast time skill. You are clearly either trolling, or completely insane.

Rook has the second lowest base armor rating in the game, 20 points higher than Erebus and tied with TB. Both, however, gain more armor per level than him. Also, the difference between UB's and Rook's base armor is more than 200.

Being a skill armor does not affect ooze, and by mid-game most ooze builds have stacked armor to the point where each tower shot does slightly over 100 damage.

 

Their health will be more or less the same by mid-game, and those consumables and hammer slam can be interrupted by foul grasp, even with boulder roll.

Not every map has a neutral hp flag.

 

Hammer Slam's cast time is 1.5 seconds, there's no way UB won't be able to interrupt it. Those numbers are just plain wrong.

boulder roll rank II+ means i can get hammer slam off with 0% chance of interrupt

I dont think tower upgrades from the cit upgrade Rook towers.  Atleast, I never noticed them getting better even after investing in the upgrades.

Didn't knew that about Rook, thought he since he was a walking castle he would have some armor lol, didn't check the numbers. But it still not important: 200-300 is not enough to make a difference and can be easily overcome by armorstacking.

I found that UB usually use their grasp too early, either way, if he doesnt he cant interrupt your teleport/potion. I always got a Hammerslam off really with lag and all. In general though you should use your hammerslam after someone interrupted you, if they dont interrupt you draw it out with a potion, you cant interrupt both potion AND hammerslam. You obviously NEVER try to slam someone that has is interrupt ready, you do it when its on CD, except when you have RR II.

A little over 100 dmg is still wickedly much, if you multiply that times 8 you get 800 every hit. Plus shoulder and AA thats beyond anything the UB can muster. Ooze is not mitigated but AA sure is, meaning you will do a lot less dps than Rook with around the same hp. 

HOWEVER, Rook is not OP, for simple reasons± he cannot finish a half decent player, he is fast enough(only 10 percent less speed than the rest) but not very mobile since he can easily picked off without his castle. I dont say Rook is unbeattable, I NEVER said that, please read better. But you cant attack a Rook in his towerfarm. There are some counters though, namely picking them off with regulus and mines or with torchbearer, an OOZE UB running STRAIGHT in wont stand a change, that is just stupid, you are pretending that OOZE UB has some godly amount of dps, AND 6k+ hp AND 2k armor. You can count towers as another player autoattacking you, that is the kind of dmg; you are saying your oozeUB can 2vs1. Rook gets sick amount of dps but loses mobility. 

P.S. Its true that not all maps have an hpflag, but usually people play Rook on the maps that do;-), it doesnt change that much though.

Zoom zoom zoom!

So once again we assume the UB has no clue what he is doing and the Rook plays perfectly and can set up a farm that both keeps people out of the lane AND can fire on one DG with all eight towers so that you can explain how great you are. Congratulations lifekatana, you proved that if your opponenet's suck and you have the perfect conditions, you can win at this game. Who would have thought?

And seriously, you don't even KNOW the value of Rook's armor, and are talking about it? FFS, learn about the game before talking out of your ass. 200 armor is a lot, and that's just at level one; Rook also has some of the lowest armor growth in the game (I think it is the lowest), so UB will always have a big armor advantage on him.

God have you people problems reading??? I did NOT say Rook was OP. I DO NOT SAY HE IS OP. I'm just counterring a stupid argument of an UB being able to run straight in and kill a Rook because he has more hp and more armor and more dmg.  IF YOU RUN STRAIGHT in a towerfarm with an UB you are stupid.

Please someone SHOW ME a replay that shows an UB running straight in a towerfarm and killing a good Rook.

Oh im sorry I didnt check the lua files accuratevly and looking up every stat, I already apologized for the inconsistency. If you play a game slight stat variance are so meaningless in face of proper position btw. If I play Rook I usually have high armor since I can stack chestpieces since I dont have to get speed or dmg, so I would think Rook would have high natural armor. 200 armor is certainly not enough to make a difference even early game, besides were talking mid game here no? 

LOL, stop being so egocentic, I wasen talking to you.

....oops

as i talked about op and you posted directly after me passing some minutes after my post it is more than understandable to think it is directed to me. especially were the previous poster did not said anything that fits into your comment!

so you are still wrong.