Tbh, I think Zen god and Renz would be better in this then Ninki and Teseer. Zen_God understands that most of what people are saying is stupid and Renz, while I agree to some lengths that we do share common opinions (We do differ about builds), he is still more relevant then Ninki. Also, as Shane mentioned, we just can't have OMG running the show featuring boxxy, I think a way better committe panel would be:
Boxxy_Koush
Pacov
Renz
Zen_God
McShane
And maybe Zex (Or teseer, not sure).
2 Boxxies, 2 OMG's and 2 GM's.
I think this would provide a much thought out tier system, rather then us having to go through Ninki's know everything, can't do nothing approach in which he never ever backs down from a point unless it is sugar coated via a friend. Ninki has even said give the list to someone who cares, so I see no reason why he should be on it or even moderate.
Thoughts?
~Thoughts on Pacov's comments which I see after I finished posting~
Note the tier 1 list I provided - not a single OMG member in it... isn't that strange?
I don't think everyone would upkeep your high standards (from OMG).
Anyway, my take is that the people that are on the committee will all vote a bit differently. Then we get our initial list setup. Then we have matches and people that think they have been placed incorrectly can fight it out, earn the place in the correct tier, and that's all there is to it. I really expect that the committee should ONLY be useful for initial placement. Anyway, I don't have the final say as it is a committee, I just think different viewpoints of experienced players is the best way to go for the list's creation instead of the same view point from a few players that regularly play together.
I'm not sold on the idea that all OMG members (Aside from you) would vote differently...You make some valid points of course, but with the selected committee individuals I'm not sold on the idea that they will create the best viewpoints.