Pantheon games human only

AI will never be as smart as humans, so for competative games keep them out. If there aren't enough people waiting for a pantheon game then wait or 1v1. 1v1 is a million times better than AI that fill the slots for 2v1's

It pisses me of that games start uneven (humanvs human) and AI fill the slots. Pantheon means nothing to me if there are AI playing. AI will never be gods.

I'm sure the AI will be a little smarter in retail but unless we have some kind of controle over them it's pointless. If i do have controle over the AI i'm playing 2 DG's at the same time.

1,478 views 9 replies
Reply #1 Top

agreed

Reply #2 Top

I haven't actually been able to get into a Pantheon game yet but I agree, AI should not be able to play in Pantheon.

Reply #3 Top

signed

Reply #4 Top

This needs to be human only played a few games and most had only two humans the rest AI

Reply #5 Top

I do agree as well.. as far as AI is not better or close to an mere human player.

 

But AI sould take over a departing player if ever it hapens... and I think the game should continue unless all a team is only AI...

Reply #6 Top

AI should be in. But we need a way to communicate some basic instructions/commands to them. Like asking for help, follow requests, etc. Like the beacons usually found in some RTS games.

Reply #7 Top

I think they should be in skirmish matches, in which giving commands would be great... but I don't thing they should be in matches that actually count for something.

Reply #8 Top

Yeah, human only for Pantheon.

Reply #9 Top

Agreed, but i think the AI is just a fill-in for the test of overall Pantheon (points, records, game history etcs). The retail or later betas should fix this, i hope.