High towers severely skews the balance of demigods IMO.

Regulus wtf

Oh, and please announce that you have towers on high to the new joiners.  I can't stand finding out the hard way.

its not my clone

this guys sees it!

only tower high make the game meaningful

but ofc hard to get approval from kiddos used to get erebus and oak and ignore them

im very happy that finally more ppl see the truth!!

thnx god

I absolutely agree with this topic. High Towers are where it's at. Because no matter how great a Regulus or whomever you prefer to play. You can NEVER be in two places at once.

If a lone Regulus is downing your towers before level 5, you are doing something very, very wrong. It takes forever to kill a tower as Reg.

if only we could code mods..

Haha, I see what you did there!

Anyway, in terms of object placement within a level, such as Towers, we can - those objects are added to the 3D Model that makes up the level rather than being a physical part of the 3D Model itself. You could also, technically, add additional Towers if you were so inclined.

im all for high towers ... normal towers r for noobs....IMO

i wasn't aware people played without high towers, whats the point in having towers if they're not going to hurt?

i take it you dont like it when i own u like that?

Ha, I dont mind towers either way. Just delays till i get a bit of armour.

Ill rephrase.

High TOWERS?

You haven't been part of some hiliarious pre-match lobbies with some of the aus demigod community then

IN the pantheon you do not get to choose, so whatever is the default I's say that is how the game is supposed to be played. That means normal towers are.

And DGs taking out towers are not the problem in any game. If you do not defend your towers or take the other team's towers out fast enough you deserve to be pushed back. Improper defending or attacking will not mask your poor playing. I do not see any real advantage to setting the towers to high in that case. I am with zxzxza.

Towers are there to defend but they should fall against the focus of DGs. You are there to push the other DGs back so your towers remain where they are. You can even fight under the cover of your tower if you need to defend the tower. This way the tower helps in pushing other DGs back because they should run when you have the upper hand like this.

'DGs are there to fight' is such a meak statement because it could mean anything. DGs could very well fight to defend your towers. He could also fight to destroy enemy towers. In no way should the towers ever take over the job of the DG. Defending is the DG job, the tower is just there to guarantee every team some control of the map in the early game. If you play so poorly that your towers fall very quickly then your playstyle may need some rethinking.

Buffing the towers will just mask your poor playing because they last a bit longer, but in the end the real men will defend the base and push back enemy DGs themselves. Good players do not rely on coocked up settings.

This is pretty much the amount of stupidity where I refuse to argue any further. Well done.