lol, no, if I were to change my name, I would no forget everything.Although, yes you may be right in some aspects, but you are not adding up all of the numbers. While yes, spit is far more effective, and even has a longer effect duration, BW dramaticly increases your damage. Yes, waiting till around 16-20 is a great way, but with some crit items, and FG + ooze (ooze does pwn, i must admit), I can dominate the competition. My only source of damage is not AA, i prefer to include ooze in there. Sorry if i didnt mention that earlier. Yes, i get your point, BW does not add a signifigant amount of power, unless you already have power, but with ooze, and my stun, it does work well. Yes, the entire point of our dispute is to debate whether or not BW is effective early on. At level one, yes it can be bypassed by spit, but most of spit's damage is over time, not directly, and your AA will already be more amplified. Late game it dominates, and now, most can disagree. However, ooze and BW do work very well together. Ooze gives you a defensive buff, (less AA speed for enemies), and might as well be a secondary, but weaker AA, and BW really boosts your damage. Most are biased towards the fact of spit being far more effective, simply because it works way the hell better, and I admit it, it does, simply because it is his most basic skill. If you use BW correctly, nobody can stand a chance.I already know you will find someway to contredict what I say, thats fine. Im just makin my point here. Anyways, this is an interesting debate. Maybe we should make a post on this, to argue about which of these two skills is more effective early game. Let's see watcha got 