woca
maybe if we all ban together and report him for trolling he'll get kicked then we can go reference all the crappy threads and double posts for proof
[quote who="Schobbo" reply="2" id="2301575"]Connectivity is actually really good since they fixed it. If you still have problems it might be you and not the game.[/quote]
nat first i didnt suggest because no modding and gpg had demigods planned already if i remember correctly and if not they probably could make better guys, but if modding comes ideas are good to put up and then a modder can help the designer
um, this is just a list of htings you should do whether you are winning or losing
What would this podcast be for? Are you sure Frogboy will do this(not to make him sound awful, but if this is for your random site he and he's busy i doubt he would)? hope it all works out
[quote who="transitive" reply="4" id="2300895"]i find that Oak works best as a Tank. stacking speed items on him seems a bit strange, none of his abilities suggest hit and run tactics at all. he's very focused on stand and fight type of stuff. its often not so important to obsess over running down your opponent for a high risk kill. you've achieved your goal if you can just manage to force them out of a lane without taking too much damage yourself. i'd much rather rely on a team-mate like Reg
[quote who="Schobbo" reply="6" id="2299646"]I don't believe anything foreshadowed says, after all he is forum troll #1 around here.[/quote]
someone mentioned two oaks - they could not get near them. would you allow oak and ub? you won;t touch them with pent and spit, then foul grasp, then another pent spit combo. again, people are afraid of dups when in fact nothing is wrong, it's teamwork. and of course if you are rook and they have two ub's, that sucks and all but it's not ridiculously unbalanced, they ahve two guys that can counter you, it happens. would you bitch as much if it was ub and reg? probably not, even thoguh are bot
it's not worth it trying to get him to realize it stacked also, please stop pm's im out
nothing is wrong with double - i have a thousand big posts with it - if people complain they don't understand basic logic - when they hate doubles they tend to complain about two spits or something - they blame the move when it tends to actually be the team work
[quote who="Scoutdog" reply="3" id="2296573"]Seriously, people: get in touch with reality. It would do you a world of good. I'm not even going to try to correct any of this: the only people who would believe it do not care about facts anyway.[/quote] [quote who="Darkodinplus" reply="9" id="2296814"]/ignore political flame thread.[/quote] well i ignored it a bit
[quote who="WickedBear" reply="14" id="2296314"] the game is too often decided by the first kill Wrong. And why would you want them to take development time away from fixing the BUGS, instead of rewarding people for losing consistently?[/quote] your asking a loaded question - good try again, we already talked about this, i'm starting to question your ability to read - the rules are to be added to help give wiggle room, not to help the worst
all out
[quote who="WickedBear" reply="11" id="2296239"]The options are about as pointless as those racing games that let the loser catch up in the end and win even though the loser raced the game perfectly. I see no point in rewarding failure, game option or not. They can make mistakes and still win, they don't need the game to autobalance so whatever you do the entire 30 minutes doesn't matter.[/quote] this game can't be called competitive - rooks tower don't place half the time, oak's ward
let them be options - the 'pros' can play without them, whose who want it can have it. lot of people are complaining about premades- that means a lot of people play casually(don't want to get serious people to paly a ton). this offers those casual players a way back in the game when their team is down - people make mistakes, casual players arn't gonna be experts, if they can learn form it they can get better and actualy compete in the match
i love your posts: you havn't posted anything reasonable suggesting they should sue, and take the 'high road' out of the argument. fine by me, you aren't fooling anyone ps- i have 6 beta keys left for those who want them
you two saying they should sue is a great example of our legal system: dear god that things seems similar, we should sue please, give me a valid reason for them to sue. i'll even let you assume they can shut s2 down and get some cash. but hey, we were making a dota game!!!1!!1 - letting people work on a huge project that is what they are getting money to live off of then shutting it down now is f***ed up. blizzard is a pretty damn good company, pr
i wasn't under the impression blizzard needs more money. and i don't think you understand business law as much as you make it out to be. i'm no expert, but if you can provide some examples that'd be great because clearly you know more than me. "if they love dota that much they'll get over it" - have you heard of DRM? DRM is bad, people don't like DRM, people pass up games with DRM just because DRM. What does that mean - upset customers don't use products. upset do
[quote who="WickedBear" reply="5" id="2295845"] they didn't make DOTA, and so what if S2 were inspired by dota? Blizzard owns ALL content associated with wc3, including maps made with their map editor. The game looks like an exact clone of dota, thats why they're at risk. They added no originality, just seems like a direct clone to me. Demigod did not go this route, demigod is a unique game completely with only slight similarities.[/quote] they didn't copy maps,
[quote who="mudzis" reply="9" id="2295841"] i'm in shock people are making serious responses to this why??? at least i have idea sedna is wery bad ageinst creaps and i almost nevar play whit her, regulus is not good ageinst creaps too if you dont use mines and i almost nevar do. and i say it one more time 400 damage i wold say mayby in 10 sec is not much if you thing diferent you are big noob, if you wold go ageinst demigot thet hes blood of fallen
[quote who="WickedBear" reply="3" id="2295795"]Not sure why blizzard hasn't filed a lawsuit yet.[/quote] the only way i think blizzard could make more people angry is if they didn't put LAN in starcraft 2. (see what i did there) they didn't make DOTA, and so what if S2 were inspired by dota? they didn't take characters out of Warcraft, they didn't take the engine, they didn't do anything illegal. is blizzard gonna sue GPG cause of demigod?
i'm in shock people are making serious responses to this
I hate having a game that has lost its multiplayer base. It's a pain then to find a friend who wants to play, so I want to organize a list of what ames you guys play. I figure these forums don't have too many jerks, so it'd be a good place. My games: RTS: Warcraft 3 + expansions Starcraft + expansion Sins of a solar empire + expansion CoH + Opposing Fronts DoW2 DoW SS Dem
hit the users name and menu shows up