spell damage isn't reduced from armor.

clearly u got what u payed for

The formula for mitigation on armor is: Mitigation = (Armor*0.0004)/(1+(Armor*0.0004))*100

Solving for 75% ...

75 = AX / (1+AX) * 100

0.75 = AX / (1+AX)

0.75(1+AX) = AX

0.75 + 0.75 AX = AX

0.75 = AX - 0.75 AX

0.75 = 0.25AX

0.75/0.25X = A = 0.75/(0.0004*(.25)) = 7500

tesb ur unkillable if u get sedna's healing auras 75% def reduction and 25% dodge cause any hit that slips through will be healed fully before the next hit in a match against a comp i was able to achieve 78 hp/sec and 128 hp/sec under 30% with 56% dmg reduction and no dodge and was pretty much unkillable especially since i can heal myself for 1500 every 10 seconds with the 15% less CD buff

where is the problem soccer? those items are only archievable  against the ai or much weaker players than you. (i am talking about ~100k gold)

okay i could barely understand that. Also i said against grunts and minis making generals alot weaker and if its 2 pros against 2 okay people whi9ch might be implented than yes u would be able to get that much and I have gotten those kind of items against players too. In 1 game all my items prices added up would prob be like 80,000 gold because it when on for a long time.

Exactly, its very hard to counter armor, maybe some items that increase spell damage, but I dodn't know that would be a very good item.

Yeah but armor is more heplful for against some than others, and if this is to be so than i think their should be a way to counter it or an advantage against those armor is not usefull against.

there is no perfect solution to this debate, but i see nothing wrong with countering a specific build with items (if Demigods have the Diversity to go either way: Spell or Normal Damage) (i also happen to believe that the Demigodskills could use some major love and that we need items which increase spell damage)

Armor system has not changed since the time of the "auto-attack rules all" complaints, yet now suddenly Armor beats it. The reason it wasn't found before is it simply wasn't tried, yet obviously: "nerf auto-attack buffing items". Try not to pull the same mistake yet again - try some other builds and itemization before lobbying for a change.

And how about, instead of wasting time with that, you test something that actually has controllable inputs. Which, for starters, means human players on all sides. AI's will choose their equipment more or less randomly - those rook AI's might not decide to go for armor or they might. That's hardly a controlled environment.

Also note that you act as if there was only one way to spec UB (auto-attack damage), which is blatantly wrong. If you are facing off against a Rook (which in itself, might be a clue to spec differently) and you notice he's going armor heavy - don't play into his game by simply doing what you always do. If you can't find a single-target spell-based spec for UB (something I doubt), you can easily switch tracks and go for an army killer build, circumventing the armor-heavy build of your opponent.

Yeah right now spells rule all and those who have high damage spells are at a great disadvantage because spells kill all. Theirs no real counter to a spell. While auto attack becomes use in late game against other DG's making it so u cant go uber statsa which i would certinly like as an option.

dis regard that reply. Spells have become the only pathway to be a good fighter and it has no real counter except get more health. While your auto attack now has a counter which is armor and it is highly effective making a uber stat strat useless. Not all Dg's have spells that do massive damage so now all DG's which do have those spells have a massive advantage. normal attacking has come to the point of almost useless for Dg combat besides Rook and Oak.