It's not "each to their own."
It is each to their own over the opinion of battle.net back in the day.....
I do not understand your die hard devotion to a game that is blatantly lacking in areas that other games have exceled in for over a decade.
I'm not asking you too.
You have 173 total games. I have 256 total games under my belt. If anything, you would think the guy with more games played would be more of a blind follower regardless of logic, but this is not the case. It is my extra games that I've played that add to my frustration in the lack of services that are provided and are a testement to my love of the game itself, but the flaws are starting to outweigh the fun as I play more games.
Sorry but i just don't see all the flaws that you are on about. I play the game in the spirit of it's intent and that is of the casual gamer.
Is the ladder perfect...no. Is matchmaking perfect...no.
Is it more than enough (on most occasions) for me...yes.
And i have played 448 games...not 173, but i fail to see how the amount of games made mean anything. I have been a Stardock customer long before Demigod was released...
What you keep comparing is two giants of the industy in EA and Blizzard to two small compaines in GPG and SD.
One should not, IMHO, compare the output and productivity of the two. What the giants can do with patches and such is overwhelming compared to what the small guys can do.....
There are may of us that find online play just fine the way it is (some small stat and matchmaking issues aside) and the issues that need addressing are known and on the way.
You want something other than that...by all means....go to EA and Battle.net and have fun.