i think i've still got installers for some wb 0.x versions on my hard drive if anyone's really curious. ;]
scratch_pentagon
anyone remember what the skin in the semi-transparent menu screenshot is? used to be one of my favorites.
oh wow, yeah, i forgot about the lighting effects feature.
wincustomize and digital blasphemy
yeah, allen bond's skins were pretty amazing. and dangeruss, but he might have been a year or two later.
remember when WB only had a couple of built-in skins? ah, those were the days.
how about a shot of royale? that's like... the non-ugly version of luna.
pardon me if i'm missing something obvious, but what new stuff does this bring to the table? or is that classified? the screenshots don't look all that different from wb5 to me.
the problem being vertical integration: if you have an ipod, you will be unable to use this service (or, at least, utilize any music you purchase from this music on said ipod).
WindowsXP itself is weird about that stuff, so I wouldn't be so quick to blame stardock. WinXP is much more likely to lose your custom colors than any previous Windows version was (i never had it happen once on any other windows version).
amen! the transparent halos are pointless. those are the skins i turn off per-pixel borders for. i'm waiting for some nice anti-aliased window borders...
good program, second only to xnview.
RC3 is 1.5 final. they decided that it was ready enough.
for now, future made skins will all need to be made with the shadows, too. it might be nice to see a future version that stores the shadows in separate graphics, and allows the option to select different shadows as you can now with toolbar icons and animations, but maybe this will come via an update to windowfx that improves compatibility with windowblinds.
he can release it to and how he wants, but the idea of a limited edition skin seems juvenile and pointless to me.
must be some kind of javascript incompatibility. apparently gecko 1.8 had a bit of a javascript overhaul, so wincustomize's code probably needs to be updated.
You will feel that your games will run FASTER due to the reasin that WB 5 runs as a native XP service instead of a process like WB4.xx. that should have absolutely no effect whatsoever on the performance aspect of things. it's just smoke and mirrors to shut up the stylexp fanboys. it does stand to r
Gregory: this is not an issue with your WB skin, it's an issue with your firefox theme. this means the firefox theme you are using is incompatible with firefox 1.5 lutikriss: if you're happy with the moz suite, you have little to gain from switching to firefox. there are a few differences, but the only one of any importance is that it doesn't have the mail client.
I hate to say it, but when vista actually hits the market for buyers, and I install it on my computer, Im not sure im ever gonna want to use another WindowBlind, MSStyle, Visual Style, etc.... again.... With the glass effect, available, there isnt much u can do to make it look any better.... Either way, this program is pretty sw
are you using the new vista icons by any chance? IX chokes on them.
What a silly analogy. Maxthon is a wrapper for IE. It's NOT a completely independent browser. And OSX is NOT a wrapper for Windows. he meant to say "it's called objectdock".
betanews just reported that they've decided *NOT* to include MSH in Longhorn because it won't be completed in time.
note that this very same flaw exists in IE6 with XP SP2 (fully patched). try the secunia test. i don't know why this isn't being reported by everyone who reports that the flaw exists in firefox.
is that battery meter dealie in the taskbar also from OD2k5? that's the kind of thing i'm using a program called TrueLaunchBar to get now, but if i can get 'em from OD, even better!
there is a difference between supporting bush and supporting bush's morals. i would say that, most likely, not all bush supporters think his ties to the bin laden family are morally sound. many are probably even unaware of them.