Ashain

I agree with this whole thread, it seems like such a silly little thing, but either congratulating or commiserating with your teammates at the end of the game builds a community. It lets people talk and see how the game went, and whether or not they'd like to join up with the same people again. Also with this notion i'm pretty sure the game doesn't tell you when players leave the game when the game is over. A voice cue or at least a text message would keep you from talking t

I gotta say that as described Brad, this seems like a very bad idea, or at least the incentives are set up wrong. If we simply allow people to quit once things start going against them, where's the incentive to keep playing? Oh well gg, time to find the next match. Imagine a 2v2 where one person quits and there's no AI replacement. Well in that case the other person on his team is royally screwed. I don't care what DG you're playing, no 1vs2 is gonna win period s

I know Brad asked for ideas on how we'd like to see this implemented somewhere else, but the thread is buried somewhere, but here's my ideas for this: 1) Need to add a lobby for pantheon. This way people could chat and set up groups if they don't have a set group of friends. 2) Need to add a friends list option like SOASE has 3) Need to add a form group option from the lobby. Whoever forms said group would be designated as the group leader and gets to press

In my experience, it seems like 1 in 10 clicks on the fight button for pantheon actually turns into a match. Most of the time in the connection info box two out of the four people just can't connect to eaxh other and then the NAT fails. Someone usually just drops out to try again and then you're left with a 2vs1. No one wants to be the 1 so then everyone just quits. About half of the ones that get past that will actually try to load the game, but someone will quit duri