Diversity, it's nice not playing the same old 3vs3 cataract with 2 identical teams of Erebus Ub and Oak. It also used to be a quick option to get a game going with no hastle.
mies
Has the frequency of prison in pantheon been turned up since the 23rd or am I just having bad luck? It's not fun playing as rook.
How about an option that allows you to change your side?
Anyone else think it'd be cool to allow shadow swap to be used on teammates as well? Think this would add even more team strategies. Also anyone else think the interrupt should be moved to warp strike? The cast time seems to long on shadow swap to ever be really usful as interrupt.
Hey weren't you teamed with turrets guy the other night?
You guys are awesome.
Awesome Thanks
lobby is full of games, can't even tell which ones are real.
Is a team without a general at a disadvantage against one with(excluding qot mid-lategame) ? I feel more and more that each team requires a certain set of roles to be filled mostly( not posivitive on importance on roles) by requirements of damage support and tank, and only a set few of characters are adaptable to these certain roles, being mostly generals. Assasins tend to be stuck in static roles where as generals can fill any roles. Some assasins are overwhelmingly g
Yea theres been heaps of posts about this lately, would appreciate a response to know the stance on this.
yea think itll cause more of an incentive to join the winning side, however it'd be a nice addition in a system where sides were randomly chosen, and there were no longer specific demigods related to these sides.
Agreed, remove sides and ai.
Fair enough, thanks for responses stardock.
Why should I want to play against or with demigods that most likely will be unbalanced if I care about rankings, that is I believe rankings matter? As I have asked before what does this say about the integrity of the ranking system? Does this mean there will be changes to ranking system soon to come? Thanks again for replying.
and the reason this decision is better then releasing it to everyone is? and the reason this doesnt divide community? and how does this argue that a small sample size of more active players is any better then a sample size that includes everyone? Please provide arguments not just smug statements.
[quote]They won't be. As with other beta patches, only thjose with the same version will be ab;e to see each other online, assuming SD goes by its own track record.[/quote So you agree with me about the divsion in community that this will create, thanks. Why is there a need to divide community? I think however that they intend (correct me if i am wrong) to allow these beta players to play against people with normal version( as i would assume to test future purchase demigod
bhhaahahaha good point
But regardless of it being available it creats a division in the community, and if all games are being rated? Where does it put people not on ready play when they are fighting these unbalanced demigods? Are the games not going to be rated? Are we having a community wide agreement that ratings are worthless, how do ratings and testing apply? it seems unfair please, review all of my questions, thanks for answer.
I am asking in regard as to what lord erebus sacrifices in order to obtain free minions. He doesn't even have to put up with the arbitrary mana cost of summoning a spirit ward. What is he sacrificing to obtain minions?
[quote]i actually assumed it was a tactic to promote ready to play, and i even posted it in the journals where frogboy mentioned that theyd select a number of ppl who signed up for r2p to test the new demis. its a pretty dog move imo. but if thats what they decided on, so be it. TBH, i reckon the more ppl who test, the better it is. You may get those players who migh post dodgy threads on the topic but you would prob get more constructive feedback more than anything else
yeah how is this a bug? However why the hell does erebus deserve free minions?
how is that so? That is a terrible argument.
erebuts is boring
nt