PunchHeadButt

I'll cover the general comments. 1. No, the game I referenced was not a "Pro" game or "No-noob" game...as I recall, all it said in the title was "3v3". Obviously, I would not join a game that specified such a thing, so that's not the issue. 2. I do, very much, understand that one person can lose a game. Like I've said, I played DOTA for years, and it was the same case in that game. But guess what? A team is going to lose. A team

Nobody had higher than 60 games except one who had 80 something. And that's beside the point...how do new players get more games under their belts if they just get kicked for NOT have enough games under their belts? If you want the game to last, worry about a strong foundation, not preserving some "l33t" basis out of principle that's carried over from an entirely different source. 200+ games? Compared to how many thousands in games that have been able to stick around?<

...of a game that is still pretty much in its infancy: don't carry your snobby "l33t" attitudes over from DOTA. I just got this game about 3 days ago (with a friend's promo code), and I dig it so far. I've played DOTA since way before Frozen Throne, and this game seems like a good step forward in that gameplay (with noteable flaws, but that's a different thread). At first, I just played vs. AI to familiarize myself, but once I could kick the crap out o