@hedgie This is a possible approach, but there is no flawless solution. If a team won more than 75% of the games but then decides it has lost all chances of getting to the top 4 or is just tired of playing, it will give teams free points they haven't played yet. This causes an unbalance to the teams that did play the 75% dropout team before they dropped out, because they had to fight hard for points and might have lost some points which teams afterwards got for free. I would put your
JUSThaveFUN
I will eat you cow! that's prolly the only lvl you have the chance to kill me, so it makes total sense ;)
[quote who="OMG_ZEX" reply="1655" id="2794716"] yeah sorry about that desync shit we probably would of won that one. I hope my big ethernet cable will make a difference when it shows up![/quote] I think it's funny how you people always think you would have won when you disconnect^^
Pacov, this is possible but most unlikely. The reason is that team B should have an over all better score, if they are a better team. If all teams in the tournament were of equal skill in a perfect world, then I would say yes this is a big issue. On the other hand I think the decision making panel committee can weight that too if this will actually happen in the tournament and make their decision. I think jon's approach is the best possible one. You cannot force anyone to play their t
fun fun times :)
[quote who="Boxxy_Mithrandar" reply="33" id="2793427"]well you can't deny you lack diversity cho gath cho gath cho gath[/quote] hehe, well I said I would go someone else but we needed a tank, remember?^^
[quote who="Boxxy_Mithrandar" reply="31" id="2793352"] people are too retarded in this game including you j/k[/quote] someone is playing with fire xD
omicron is looking for teamates spectre!
dude, that's how i felt about lol, people are too retarded in this game. and the games is just not as beautiful as demigod to play with pugs
Spectre you are back? :D we gotta play some games men, sry totally forgot you man:( But I do have a disclaimer lmao "If I forgot someone plz forgive [e digicons];)[/e] "
they are, unless early kills give erebus and andvantage. And even then, oak kills erebus in 4s late game. erebus can only balance this out with his very long stun and his mobility to get portals/damage flag.
i did, i did. just discourage, of not having any teamates
[quote who="OMG_Jona" reply="22" id="2792628"]no special mention ;(??[/quote] jona you were too new for me, i pretty much left when you came back :D
[quote who="OMG_NinkiCZ" reply="1643" id="2792610"] Quoting GM-Zen_God, reply 1641hey ninki are you throwing in some extra money if the winner is an OMG member ? The question wouldn't apply to you anyway But I probably will throw in a bonus. What's the point of saving up all this money.[/quote] maybe you're still recruiting xD
[quote who="OMG_NinkiCZ" reply="21" id="2792609"]Well he's a good rammus, but you should also know how to play carries.[/quote] i do ninki i do, just not a big fan of them
[quote who="OMG_Jongalt26" reply="498" id="2792525"]Zen, does that mean you are voting for Pot Split 2 in the above post?[/quote] yes
hey ninki are you throwing in some extra money if the winner is an OMG member ? :D
[quote who="Boxxy_Mithrandar" reply="18" id="2792459"]lol koush doesn't think highly of your cho and every1 knows that garen is THA BEAST[/quote] well koush is a bagstabbing arrogant bastard that quits playing as soon as he sees something out of the ordinary. I'll prolly would beat him with cho in a 1on1 ;)
40% for first place is ridiculous now because there is no guarantee that first will win the 20% for round robin points. I could get talked into something like that, but please stop cutting down the first place. 50% first, 25% 2nd, 15% 3rd and 10 % for round robin. you still have the 60% in case the first place wins both.
well, we have 10 teams in the tournament so far I don't think the one placing 3rd need to win money. My major reasons are: 1. I rather win nothing than lousy 46$ which i will be contributing 10 of my own lol. I rather grant the first two winnings teams a bigger price pool for all their hard efforts. 2. There is a very low amount of teams, I could understand maybe if there were 32 or 64 teams to give the 3rd place price money. 3rd. the prize pool is relatively low, in w
I vote for elimination in the best of 4, so we don't have that many games and the team being the best wins and not the team with the most points wins. And I think by then it will be clear who the 2 top teams will be, that round robin style in the best of 4 would be redundant. As for the prize I think 3rd place doesn't need a price with currently 10 teams and a relatively low price that is split among so many players. vote concerning best of 4.: KO system b
I think peter should commentate silly replays, like my ashkandormageslayer ub fail replay :D not the pro one's though^^ if peter does a commentary on this replay without having seen it before, I think i would pay him for that, because it would be just too hilarious xD http://www.gamereplays.org/demigod/replays.php?game=51&show=details&id=153523
pacov i could see you doing a daily of Demigod to analyze such things, where you often don't have time for in the game because too much action is going on in a 3v3 :D at least a weekly !
I think he did it "live" without having seen it before. And I think that makes the commentary way better if the commentator doesn't know what's going on :D
[quote]Yes, so what [/quote] I like your style [e digicons](\B):vulcan:(\B)[/e]