JUSThaveFUN

JUSThaveFUN

Joined Member # 3774717
18 Posts 1,127 Replies 20,628 Reputation

[quote who="4Nana" reply="10" id="2789370"]speaking of other terrible issues w/ demigod, not having reverse compatibility to watch older replays is terrible. Another reason SC2 is win.[/quote] compare blizzard to stardock, why don't we start comparing Switzerland with Afghanistan -.- topic...

81 Replies 28,231 Views

[quote who="Orcun-" reply="351" id="2789302"] I still think we should play 2 games with tourney's dg restriction rules and one free for all dg selection game in order to have more variety but since no one has wrote anything about it besides pacov, i suppose people aren't in favor of this. [/quote] I would like to see a 3rd game like that. That means i have to practice all them tier 1 demis again :D

924 Replies 1,818,686 Views

4nana please don't quote me out of context. I said [quote who="GM-Zen_God" reply="346" id="2789258"] just saying oak ub reg/da and LE oak reg/da are hardcore combos. And even UB rook reg/da are fatal once priests are out. I think our current system is just fine and we can leave it by that . But, extra points could just add as an incentive to use so called "stupid" combos to get extra points maybe to add on my idea the winning team cannot have

924 Replies 1,818,686 Views

[quote who="4Nana" reply="344" id="2789249"]there is already incentive because they have to pick up a reg or da. I don't see the issue? Perhaps you should penalize the team who went occ sed tb because they choose a really stupid combo Or perhaps penalize the team that picks qot / oak / occ for having 3 generals, or give an extra benefit to the team that goes rook / ub / reg because they don't have a general but then give the other team a benefit too because they took 2 tier

924 Replies 1,818,686 Views

[quote who="OMG_Jongalt26" reply="339" id="2789213"]Point system suggestions: System 1: You win a game, you get 1 point. If you lose a game you get 0 points. The teams with the most points are the winners (or go onto a final shoot-out, which can be discussed after the point system is ironed out) That's about as simple as it gets, why have anymore? System 2: (weighted - cont

924 Replies 1,818,686 Views

[quote who="LORD-ORION" reply="330" id="2789078"] Quoting OMG_pacov, reply 329 Here are the official voting results for demigod restrictions after voting. 1 Point - DA or Reg 2 Points - Oculus, QoT, Senda, TB 3 Points - Erb, Oak, Rook, UB No duplicates allowed and you can have a maximum of 7 points per 3 man team. So, what we are saying is we never want to see Occ, Qot, Sedna, TB or DA in a game? What we r

924 Replies 1,818,686 Views

[quote who="OMG_ZEX" reply="288" id="2788382"] Quoting OMG_ZEX, reply 2731 DA REG 2 TB SED OC QOT 3 OAK EREBUS ROOK UB MAX 7 POINTS I think this will be my vote for the demigod selection. It is much more simple than the previous incarnations even though I like the 3 list proposed by nom, me and orcun.[/quote] why would you retype it all caps lol anyway yeah it seems to be the simplest form of all concerns and thoughts in this t

924 Replies 1,818,686 Views

[quote who="nomilarac" reply="286" id="2788373"]It had to be 5 or more. But let's inverse it and put it zex's way: 1. DA, Reg. 2. Sedna, QoT, Oculus, TB. 3. Rook, UB, Oak, L. Erebus. Max 7 points. Even if it looks too simple i think the end result will be pretty much the same as with your other system, and it will help making DG selection a little easier in the tourney games. But let's hear the community.[/quote] I think that is t

924 Replies 1,818,686 Views

[quote who="BadDaddy8" reply="282" id="2788363"]I think we can get carried away with trying to balance it exactly completely fairly. So you ban oak/le/ub, because everyone would play that. Then you ban rook/ub/oak if the first isn't allowed, then everyone plays that. And so on... If you created a ranking of what the community agrees were the best combos in order, every time you ban one, the next one down becomes the "obvious" choice, until every match is da/reg/tb. I thi

924 Replies 1,818,686 Views

and maybe make da = to zero? any team can have a da on their team, so ub rook da would be possible? [quote who="nomilarac" reply="280" id="2788351"]Zen, my system didn't allow UB/Rook/Sedna nor UB/Rook/QoT : 1+1+2= 4 CowZex, your just suggested system is exactly the same as mine but with an inversed points system (Max points rule instead of min points rule). I still vouch for my system (or cow's recent one if you

924 Replies 1,818,686 Views

possible teams if total count would be 12 rook, oak/le, da rook, sed/occ, da rook, sed/occ, reg rook, qot, tb rook, qot, reg rook, qot, da rook, tb, reg rook, tb, da UB, oak/le, da UB, Sed/occ, da UB, Sed/occ, reg UB, qot, tb UB, qot, reg UB, qot, da UB, tb, reg UB, tb, da oak, le, reg oak, le, da oak, sed/occ, qot/tb oak, sed/occ, reg oak, sed/occ, da le, sed/occ

924 Replies 1,818,686 Views

[quote who="OMG_pacov" reply="261" id="2788024"]its official - there is no draft this tourney. Form your own teams. If you do not form your own teams, you will not be playing this tourney. The cut off date for forming teams and registering is 10/3/2010. If you need help, please say so here and we will try to get you paired up appropriately. I think a little creativity in the marketing department would at least give some hope to this product. If

924 Replies 1,818,686 Views

@pacov Orcun and Cow's suggestion are identical despite the position of Regulus. Nomilarac's suggestion looks way too simple, where a team forming UB, Rook, and sedna is possble sigh. I'll go more with Orcun's suggestion than with cow's. DA will never hit 15, there is a gap from 14 to 16 cow! and that character is just terrible in comparison to Regulus. [quote who="GM-McShane87" reply="247" id="2787506"]To make things more exciting, I will donate $20 to the pot but

924 Replies 1,818,686 Views

Oh my gentlemen, don't you guys have a member count around 40? Please form more tournament teams :D

2,427 Replies 3,798,964 Views