nzac

[quote]Thanx for the personal attack on my friend.[/quote] was assmuming that your buddy does not read the forums. [quote]Also there are things called rogue programs that look like the real thing.[/quote] Depends on how many checks you make that the programm is legit. Only run programmes from sites that you know have more to loose than gain from supplying you with a virus. I dont think i have every got to the stage where a virus scanner has stoped me from intalling a p

[quote who="narbytrout" reply="10" id="2598305"]I have never owned Microsoft Office... is it really that much better than the latest Open Office to warrant a purchase?[/quote] Its better but not worth the purchase unless you really want a feature it has. It looks nicer and has annoying (my opinon) ribbons but nothing open office has everything you would generally need. If you need more power or features or power latex or ocatave (may not run on windows) could interest you. Tho

[quote]You just put how it would need to be hacked there. All would be needed is to know what code tells the ipad that the program is from apple. Also my buddy has a macbook and did get a virus...There are less of them out there just because less people use apple and virus makers are trying to hit the most people at once.[/quote] If you call him your buddy and he owns a mac i would think there a resonable chance that the streotype of idiot mac user may apply. I suppose if th

[quote who="VistArtXPosed" reply="71" id="2597005"]The sucky thing is that the more popular the iPad & iPhone becomes, the more likely it will suffer from virus attacks and hacking, just like PCs. iPhone viruses already work on the iPad because it uses the same OS, so don't think that because the iPad is from Apple, you're automatically safe. Do iPads even have antivirus/antispyware software anyway?[/quote] I would not think it possible, unless you jail broke it,

[quote who="PurrBall" reply="65" id="2596585"]I posted this from the iPad simulator, which is the same thing and it works fine.[/quote] It's not if works or not (i guess its good to know its compadible), i was asking how much harder (or fustrating) it is to make a post from an ipad. Assuming you still type with keyboard the simulator does not really count. Being able to write text is a significant part of web browsing. Im shure a touch screen can replace a mouse (or be better

[quote]I do get their point though--I don't need a netbook and it would not work for what I will use the iPad for. Two different animals.[/quote] Like a donkey and horse you mean. They are both do pretty much the same thing. One looks better to maybe 40 percent of the population the other has a lot more uses. I will appoligise though it seems you are using the pad for presenting information where i agree with you that a net book is not useful. For somewhat specilised ne

[quote]Exactly how is queen/oak, queen/le and queen/queen op?[/quote] synn be smart here look at whats left on that list. If a 'fair' 2vs2 tournement was held queen/ub, queen/rook and queen/sedna would be the best demigod pairs or at least amoung them. You would be in the very least able to play queen compdeditively.

[quote]The fact that I am willing to get one (I have resisted Macs from the start when the internet was still a baby) says a lot about the quality of it--flaws and limitations aside. [/quote] I would think they have just sucessfully 'brainwashed' you too. I guess if you lazy and rich enough then i guess that for you i might be currently the best product on the market for you. If you set up a net book right and just want to use it for (30 to 45 min if you know what you are doin

[quote]I'm not seeing it. When my father and I both played around with it in BestBuy we were both were struck with how fuzzy it was. Sure, it's not bad but the way they were advertising it made it seem like it was much more revolutionary than it actually was. The resolution wasn't bad but it was basically comparable to a netbook. I was not impressed at all. You know, it's not that I want to trash the iPad as a piece of technology. It really isn't that bad. The media has just made i

I want to see the cooling design if nvidia ever try to put two of these together in the same card 500+ W of power drawn. Guess it would scale well though from the reviews i have seen. Unless nvidia have missed something minor that can significalty reduce power (heat produced) requirements i cant see the 4xx cards going much faster. 10 percent (20 tops) of preformance gamers have a rig that would not need significant upgrades to support the 480 at resonable temps. (If anyone ha

[quote]I have 15 games or so and 30% score, but how can you judge me by that when this whole game is based on TEAM-Play?[/quote] First of all those stats hardly inspire confidence that you know how to play the game or are any good at it, there are worse stats but almost anyone can win 4 or 5 out of 15 games by getting on pro teams and pathanon. The main reson they do this is that having a bad player (relitive to rest of the people in the game) on your team generally resaults i

http://forums.demigodthegame.com/373678/page/1/#2506415 Ptarth has a solution here i think i am missing an end statement some where. I still cant see why my second solution does not work.

im fairly shure thats the line, i thought that was the right place for it you could try using the line: Buff.RemoveBuffsByDebuff(unit, true) outside the if Has abiltiy statement, appears gpg may have rewritten the function for occulass so the input veriable are different. Ill edit the above code again. You could also try changing 'unit' to 'target' also. How have you been testing it, i could see if i can get it working.

[code="javascript"] ################################################################################################################# # Func: Brain Storm ################################################################################################################# function BrainStorm(abilityDef, unit, params) local target = params.Targets[1] local maxEnergy = target:GetMaxEnergy() local cur

Apart from bug fixes occ is powerful enough as it is. The only things that could be touched are ball lightning and the giving mana ability (removing debuffs at level 10 or possibly 5 could make the skill useful and still underpowered compared to others). There is a reason that blast off 1 has a low aoe: its so occ can't farm an intrire creep wave and tele to saftey at level 1 (somthing that would be really nice to be able to do, but is very much overpowered). </p

You do realise that attacking while moving is only good if the enermy is running away. Apart from that hes just the same as before. Still has the longest interupt cast time of anyone(droping to ice for a deep freeze)/no stun, no late game and all the other lacking stuff thats the reson hes never played. Im faily shure that there are number of counter to fire TB that no one has bothered to develop because he is shit and will loose you the game anyway. His main power is in the levels 4

Rosco_P do you know the reason for inputing the email address? Is it to test a new impulse feature or something like that?

[quote who="awuffleablehedgie" reply="12" id="2505568"] Quoting Epiphenomenon, reply 11Does it involve microing my monks outside of the counter-healer's presence? Assuming you're in melee range, CH has a large enough aura a monk outside of the CH aura is also out of range to heal whoever is engaging the Sedna. Unless you're Rook, perhaps. Hint: It's exploiting a bug, it /shouldn't/ happen D:[/quote] Does anyone know if counterhealing works while sedna is moving? t

I think he will be pretty good. I think he can deal 2150 with large aoe every 10 secs for a 1 sec total cast time just from 8 points (worked it a while back the numbers might be off by a little, double hit with the tele and chain lightning). From my two games games with the DA/OC mod he appeared to be the best farmer in the game capable of getting a number of levels a head of everyone else with more gold. Chain can take out creep waves from a longer distance than rain of ice. I think

Well i do think that gpg should put some more effort in getting single player working since significantly over half of the revenue from the game comes from the singleplayer side (though it does serve them right since the dont add to getting mutiplayer games going). Though achivements not functioning does seem a little excessive for complaing, they could work on the ai and other stuff to make singplayer/lan better. Is compleating achivements what the people who dont play online

Dont know if these are best games of the decade but they they are either were a new standard to compare games to or established a whole new genre. Every game game on that list has changed gaming in some way, not all of them were for the better though. At least half those game are now inferiour to games that they inspired.

[quote]Lord Erebus, Oak, and the Unclean Beast are too powerful. Not just in relation to the other demigods mind you. If you buffed the other six demigods to equal power with the golden trio, you would end up with quick confusing skill mashing battles where everyone would die in three seconds and think to themselves omgwtfbbq. You can't have everyone dealing incredible damage, using interrupts, stuns, and nukes. The gameplay would get too complex, it would lose its strategic elements. No demi

What do you mean viable? I can make one up that is more viable than reg, queen, DA and most TBs. The main problem is that non yeti builds are just better and everyone knows it. Yetis are not that bad but always worse than non yeti builds. What you are really wanting is for GPG to ballance the game, since they appear not to want to at the moment the best thing you can do is go to the mod forums and support ballance mods.

Since you took the time to explain it, ill put the time to explian why this test does not work. I am assuming that a semi compeditive game is minimium required test. [quote]Ok so what i tested is not directly as to whether i won or not but how well i could hold a lane/fight off other demigods, ganking capacity and general team support.[/quote] Though i have not played vs the AI mod but from the change logs it appears there have been been mimimal sucess in inproving its laning

[quote]Been testing all the dg's out with this mod: Settings: high gold, warscore, exp, spawn rate. Map prison and cat, 3v3 Nightmare ai with pepe's 1.18 mod. Conclusion - Reg: Reg is now very near OP against demigods which rely on regen.[/quote] Unless you want to explain otherwise, this is not a valid test (ai has no idea how to play vs a reg and is still bad and those settings change the game ballance so meaningfull conclutions for an actual game can't really